Model-based estimates of annual survival rate are preferable to observed maximum lifespan statistics for use in comparative life-history studies

Krementz, D.G.; Sauer, J.R.; Nichols, J.D.

Abstract:

Estimates of longevity are available for many animals, and are commonly used in comparative life-history analyses. We suggest that annual survival rate is more appropriate life history parameter for most comparative life history analyses. Observed maximum longevities were not correlated with the annual survival rate estimates and appear to be unstable over time. We recommend that observed maximum lifespans not be used in life history analyses.

Genre:

Article

ProdID:

5222315

Citation Author:

Krementz, D.G.; Sauer, J.R.; Nichols, J.D.

Citation Contributing Office:

Patuxent Wildlife Research Center

Citation Datum:

Citation Day:

Citation Edition:

Citation Editor:

Citation End Page:

208

Citation Issue:

Citation Keywords:

Citation Language:

English

Citation Larger Work Title:

Oikos

Citation LatN:

Citation LatS:

Citation LonE:

Citation LonW:

Citation Month:

Citation No Pagination:

Citation Number Of Pages:

Citation Online Only Flag:

Citation Phsyical Description:

203-208

Citation Projection:

Citation Public Comments:

3765_Krementz.pdf

Citation Publisher:

Citation Series:

Citation Series Code:

Citation Series Number:

Citation Search Results Text:

Model-based estimates of annual survival rate are preferable to observed maximum lifespan statistics for use in comparative life-history studies; 1989; Article; Journal; Oikos; Krementz, D.G.; Sauer, J.R.; Nichols, J.D.