The relationship between species density and community biomass in grazed and ungrazed coastal meadows

Oikos
By:  and 

Links

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that the relationship between community biomass and species density can be represented by a multivariate model in which abiotic variables influence species density both through effects on biomass and through effects on the species pool. In this paper, we use data from grazed and ungrazed coastal meadows in Finland to evaluate and extend this general conceptual model of the factors controlling species density. Structural equation analysis was used to evaluate a model for all meadows and then to perform a multigroup analysis to determine how grazed and ungrazed meadows differ. By itself, biomass could explain only 12% of the variation in species density while the multivariate model was able to explain 47% using five types of predictor variables: site, soil, flooding, grazing, and biomass. Analyses found that flooding explained the greatest amount of variability in species density, primarily through negative effects on the species pool. Grazing was also found to have a strong effect on species density and results suggest that its negative influence may be largely through reductions in the species pool in grazed meadows. The most important difference found between grazed and ungrazed meadows was that species density had a strong negative relationship to biomass in the ungrazed meadows but no significant relationship in the grazed ones. Thus, it appears that the influence of competition on species density was much greater in ungrazed meadows compared to grazed ones.

Study Area

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title The relationship between species density and community biomass in grazed and ungrazed coastal meadows
Series title Oikos
DOI 10.2307/3546689
Volume 85
Issue 3
Year Published 1999
Language English
Publisher Wiley
Contributing office(s) National Wetlands Research Center, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center
Description 11 p.
First page 398
Last page 408
Country Finland
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional publication details