The nomenclatural enigma of single versus double -i endings for scientific patronyms emended to represent a man's name: A comment and some considerations

Fisheries
By:

Links

Abstract

The current inconsistency over the use of single vs. double -i endings for singular masculine scientific patronyms in official lists of scientific names of fishes causes needless confusion and labor. Taxonomists once preferred rules for Latinization calling for double -i endings, but current rules suggest single -i endings. Recent rulings by the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature make it impossible to produce uniformity in this area. It is suggested that the Committee on Names of Fishes submit a petition to the Commission that modifies the present rules to allow the use of single -i endings in most cases and thus conform with current literature and the opinions of most ichthyologists.

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title The nomenclatural enigma of single versus double -i endings for scientific patronyms emended to represent a man's name: A comment and some considerations
Series title Fisheries
DOI 10.1577/1548-8446(1982)007<0009:TNEOSV>2.0.CO;2
Volume 7
Issue 5
Year Published 1982
Language English
Publisher Wiley
Contributing office(s) Western Ecological Research Center
Description 2 p.
First page 9
Last page 10
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional publication details