thumbnail

Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon Dam

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

By:
, , and
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2000)126:5(270)

Links

Abstract

Conflicts in water resources exist because river-reservoir systems are managed to optimize traditional benefits (e.g., hydropower and flood control), which are historically quantified in economic terms, whereas natural and environmental resources, including in-stream and riparian resources, are more difficult or impossible to quantify in economic terms. Multicriteria decision analysis provides a quantitative approach to evaluate resources subject to river basin management alternatives. This objective quantification method includes inputs from special interest groups, the general public, and concerned individuals, as well as professionals for each resource considered in a trade-off analysis. Multicriteria decision analysis is applied to resources and flow alternatives presented in the environmental impact statement for Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. A numeric rating and priority-weighting scheme is used to evaluate 29 specific natural resource attributes, grouped into seven main resource objectives, for nine flow alternatives enumerated in the environmental impact statement.

Additional publication details

Publication type:
Article
Publication Subtype:
Journal Article
Title:
Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon Dam
Series title:
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
DOI:
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2000)126:5(270)
Volume:
126
Issue:
5
Year Published:
2000
Language:
English
Publisher:
ASCE
Contributing office(s):
Fort Collins Science Center
Description:
7 p.
First page:
270
Last page:
276