Comparison of three methods of sampling trout blood for measurements of hematocrit
Progressive Fish-Culturist
None
By: Erwin W. Steucke Jr. and Richard A. Schoettger
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
Trout blood is frequently collected for hematocrit measurements by excising the caudal fin (Snieszko, 1960), but this technique is impractical if valuable fish are to be sampled or if repeated observations are desired. Schiffman (1959) and Snieszko (1960) collected blood from the dorsal aorta and the heart, but these methods are relatively slow and require the preparation of needles and syringes. The use of pointed capillary tubes for cardiac punctures increases the speed of sampling, but body fluids may dilute the blood (Perkins, 1957; Larsen and Snieszko, 1961; and Normandau, 1962). There is need for methods of sampling which are rapid and which neither influence hematological determinations nor harm the fish.
| Publication type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Title | Comparison of three methods of sampling trout blood for measurements of hematocrit |
| Series title | Progressive Fish-Culturist |
| DOI | 10.1577/1548-8640(1967)29[98:COTMOS]2.0.CO;2 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Year Published | 1967 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
| Publisher location | Philadelphia, PA |
| Contributing office(s) | Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center |
| Description | 4 p. |
| Larger Work Type | Article |
| Larger Work Subtype | Journal Article |
| Larger Work Title | Progressive Fish-Culturist |
| First page | 98 |
| Last page | 101 |
| Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |