Aseismic uplift in California
Science
By: Robert O. Castle, Michael R. Elliot, Thomas D. Gilmore, Robert K. Mark, Evelyn B. Newman, John C. Tinsley III, D.D. Jackson, W.B. Lee, and C.-C. Liu
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
We disagree with several of the arguments cited by Jackson et al. in support of their view that "the inference of wide-spread aseismic uplift in southern California is not justified" (1). Specifically, the striking correlation shown in figure 1 of Jackson et al. (1) is an artifact of the construction, the rod calibration data are atypical, the cited regression techniques are of doubtful value, and the geologically and geodetically determined uplift rates are inappropriately compared.
| Publication type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Title | Aseismic uplift in California |
| Series title | Science |
| DOI | 10.1126/science.213.4504.246 |
| Volume | 213 |
| Issue | 4504 |
| Year Published | 1981 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science |
| Description | 2 p. |
| First page | 246 |
| Last page | 247 |
| Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |