The effect of scale on the interpretation of geochemical anomalies
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
The purpose of geochemical surveys changes with scale. Regional surveys identify areas where mineral deposits are most likely to occur, whereas intermediate surveys identify and prioritize specific targets. At detailed scales specific deposit models may be applied and deposits delineated.
The interpretation of regional geochemical surveys must take into account scale-dependent difference in the nature and objectives of this type of survey. Overinterpretation of regional data should be resisted, as should recommendations to restrict intermediate or detailed follow-up surveys to the search for specific deposit types or to a too limited suite of elements. Regional surveys identify metallogenic provinces within which a variety of deposit types and metals are most likely to be found. At intermediate scale, these regional provinces often dissipate into discrete clusters of anomalous areas. At detailed scale, individual anomalous areas reflect local conditions of mineralization and may seem unrelated to each other. Four examples from arid environments illustrate the dramatic change in patterns of anomalies between regional and more detailed surveys.
| Publication type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Title | The effect of scale on the interpretation of geochemical anomalies |
| Series title | Journal of Geochemical Exploration |
| DOI | 10.1016/0375-6742(91)90029-T |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1-3 |
| Year Published | 1991 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Description | 15 p. |
| First page | 9 |
| Last page | 23 |
| Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |