Biological responses to climate impacts with a focus on Regional Species of Greatest Conservation Need (RSGCN)

By: , and 

Links

Abstract

This chapter reviews the responses to climate change on the 367 Regional Species of Greatest Conservation Need (RSGCN) identified by the Northeast Fish and Wildlife Diversity Technical Committee (NEFWDTC), technical experts from states’ natural resource agencies (Appendix 3.1). These species were chosen based on their conservation status, listing in SWAPs, and the percentage of their range that occurs in the Northeast. The objectives of this chapter are to: summarize how regional biodiversity has already responded and is expected to respond to climate change; summarize information on specific RSGCN species responses to climate change to date and anticipated under future scenarios; characterize the greatest uncertainties about how biodiversity and RSGCN species will respond to climate change in the future; and highlight where other factors are expected to exacerbate the effects of climate change. This information was obtained through a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature, primarily using the ISI Web of Knowledge to search for papers on each species related to “climate”, “temperature”, or “precipitation”. Although we undoubtedly missed some sources, the following allows us to review some of the ways climate change will affect regional species of conservation concern

Study Area

Publication type Report
Publication Subtype Federal Government Series
Title Biological responses to climate impacts with a focus on Regional Species of Greatest Conservation Need (RSGCN)
Chapter 3
Year Published 2015
Language English
Publisher Northeast Climate Science Center
Publisher location Amherst, MA
Contributing office(s) Northeast Climate Science Center
Description 51 p.
Larger Work Type Report
Larger Work Subtype Other Government Series
Larger Work Title Integrating climate change into the state wildlife action plans
Country United States
State Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont, West Virginia
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional publication details