On the sensitivity of transtensional versus transpressional tectonic regimes to remote dynamic triggering by Coulomb failure
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
By: David P. Hill
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
Accumulating evidence, although still strongly spatially aliased, indicates that although remote dynamic triggering of small-to-moderate (Mw<5) earthquakes can occur in all tectonic settings, transtensional stress regimes with normal and subsidiary strike-slip faulting seem to be more susceptible to dynamic triggering than transpressional regimes with reverse and subsidiary strike-slip faulting. Analysis of the triggering potential of Love- and Rayleigh-wave dynamic stresses incident on normal, reverse, and strike-slip faults assuming Andersonian faulting theory and simple Coulomb failure supports this apparent difference for rapid-onset triggering susceptibility.
Study Area
| Publication type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Title | On the sensitivity of transtensional versus transpressional tectonic regimes to remote dynamic triggering by Coulomb failure |
| Series title | Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America |
| DOI | 10.1785/0120140292 |
| Volume | 105 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Year Published | 2015 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Seismological Society of America |
| Contributing office(s) | Volcano Science Center |
| Description | 10 p. |
| First page | 1339 |
| Last page | 1348 |
| Country | United States |
| Online Only (Y/N) | N |
| Additional Online Files (Y/N) | N |
| Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |