HESS Opinions: Repeatable research: what hydrologistscan learn from the Duke cancer research scandal
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Open Access Version: Publisher Index Page
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
In the past decade, difficulties encountered in reproducing the results of a cancer study at Duke University resulted in a scandal and an investigation which concluded that tools used for data management, analysis, and modeling were inappropriate for the documentation of the study, let alone the reproduction of the results. New protocols were developed which require that data analysis and modeling be carried out with scripts that can be used to reproduce the results and are a record of all decisions and interpretations made during an analysis or a modeling effort. In the hydrological sciences, we face similar challenges and need to develop similar standards for transparency and repeatability of results. A promising route is to start making use of open-source languages (such as R and Python) to write scripts and to use collaborative coding environments (such as Git) to share our codes for inspection and use by the hydrological community. An important side-benefit to adopting such protocols is consistency and efficiency among collaborators.
| Publication type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Title | HESS Opinions: Repeatable research: what hydrologistscan learn from the Duke cancer research scandal |
| Series title | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| DOI | 10.5194/hess-20-3739-2016 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Year Published | 2016 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | EGU |
| Contributing office(s) | Wisconsin Water Science Center |
| Description | 5 p. |
| First page | 3739 |
| Last page | 3743 |
| Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |