Nitrogen cycling in large temperate floodplain rivers of contrasting nutrient regimes and management

River Research and Applications
By: , and 



Hydraulic connection between channels and floodplains (“connectivity”) is a fundamental determinant of ecosystem function in large floodplain rivers. Factors controlling material processing in these rivers depend not only on the degree of connectivity but also on the sediment conditions, nutrient loads, and source. Nutrient cycling in the nutrient‐rich upper Mississippi River (MISS) is relatively well studied, whereas that of less eutrophic tributaries is not (e.g., St Croix River; SACN). We examined components of nitrogen cycling in 2 floodplain rivers of contrasting nutrient enrichment and catchment land use to test the hypothesis that N‐cycling rates will be greater in the MISS with elevated nutrient loads and productivity in contrast to the relatively nutrient‐poor SACN. Nitrate (NO3‐N) concentrations were greatest in flowing habitats in the MISS and often undetectable in isolated backwaters except where groundwater inputs occurred. In the SACN, NO3‐N concentrations were greatest in the flowing backwater where groundwater inputs were high. Ambient nitrification in the MISS was twice that in the SACN and tended to be lowest in the main channel. Denitrification was 3× greater in the MISS than that in the SACN, N‐limited in both rivers. Community production/respiration was >1 in the MISS and likely provisioned labile C to fuel microbial metabolism and dissimilatory NO3‐N reduction, whereas the heterotrophic (production/respiration < 1) nature of the SACN likely limited microbial metabolism and NO3‐N dissimilation. It appears that N‐cycling in the SACN was driven by groundwater, whereas that in the MISS was supported mainly by water column N‐sources.

Study Area

Additional publication details

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title Nitrogen cycling in large temperate floodplain rivers of contrasting nutrient regimes and management
Series title River Research and Applications
DOI 10.1002/rra.3267
Volume 35
Issue 5
Year Published 2019
Language English
Publisher Wiley
Contributing office(s) Minnesota Water Science Center, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center
Description 11 p.
First page 529
Last page 539
Country United States
State Minnesota, Wisconsin
Other Geospatial Mississippi River, St. Croix River
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional metadata about this publication, not found in other parts of the page is in this table