Comparison of physical to numerical mixing with different tracer advection schemes in estuarine environments

Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
By: , and 

Links

Abstract

The numerical simulation of estuarine dynamics requires accurate prediction for the transport of tracers such as temperature and salinity. During the simulation of these processes, all numerical models introduce two kinds of tracer mixing: 1) by parameterizing the tracer eddy diffusivity through turbulence models leading to a source of physical mixing and 2) discretization of the tracer advection term that leads to numerical mixing. Both physical and numerical mixing vary with the choice of horizontal advection schemes, grid resolution, and time step. By simulating four idealized cases, this study compares physical and numerical mixing for three different tracer advection schemes. Idealized domains involving only physical and numerical mixing are used to verify the implementation of mixing terms by equating them to total tracer variance. Among the three horizontal advection schemes, the scheme that causes the least numerical mixing while maintaining a sharp front also results in larger physical mixing. Instantaneous spatial comparison of mixing components shows that physical mixing is dominant in regions of large vertical gradients while numerical mixing dominates at sharp fronts that contain large horizontal tracer gradients. In the case of estuaries, numerical mixing may dominate locally over physical mixing; however, the amount of volume integrated numerical mixing through the domain compared to integrated physical mixing remains relatively small for this particular modeling system.
Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title Comparison of physical to numerical mixing with different tracer advection schemes in estuarine environments
Series title Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
DOI 10.3390/jmse7100338
Volume 10
Issue 7
Year Published 2019
Language English
Publisher MDPI
Contributing office(s) Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center
Description 338, 23 p.
Additional Online Files (Y/N) N
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional publication details