Building a library of source samples for sediment fingerprinting – Potential and proof of concept
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Open Access Version: Publisher Index Page
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
Purpose
Sediment fingerprinting of fluvial targets has proven useful to guide conservation management and prioritize sediment sources for Federal and State supported programs in the United States. However, the collection and analysis of source samples can make these studies unaffordable, especially when needed for multiple drainage basins. We investigate the potential use of source samples from a basin with similar physiography (using samples from one of a “pair” to evaluate samples from the other) or combined from multiple basins (a “library”).
Methods
Source samples from eight basins across six ecoregions were harvested from existing, published studies. Individual source samples were fingerprinted using a mixing model derived from source samples from other basins. The ability to identify source category was evaluated both as part of source verification and by classifying source samples as “targets.”
Results
Approximately half of cropland samples were identified as targets, both as pairs and with the multi-basin source dataset, indicating that cropland samples could be shared for basins in similar ecoregions and be combined for larger stream systems. Streambank samples were better identified with the multi-basin analysis relative to the pairs, and those from mixed land-use basins improved this differentiation except for samples from basins with a dominant land-use type. Inconsistent identification of pasture samples highlighted the need for local samples. Inconsistent identification of forest samples indicated that upland- and riparian-forest samples are distinct. Road samples were identified as both sources and targets, and other source types were rarely apportioned as road: these may have the best potential to supplement local source samples. This source-sample library was then used to improve the accuracy of sediment-source apportionment for a previously studied basin.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the source verification process already used in individual basin studies to evaluate the accuracy of sediment-fingerprinting apportionments was useful for determining how to supplement local source samples with those from other basins. This study shows that supplementing local source samples with those from basins with similar physiography has the potential to both improve fingerprinting accuracy and decrease the cost of this type of study.
| Publication type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Title | Building a library of source samples for sediment fingerprinting – Potential and proof of concept |
| Series title | Journal of Environmental Management |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117254 |
| Volume | 333 |
| Year Published | 2023 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Contributing office(s) | Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Water Science Center, Upper Midwest Water Science Center |
| Description | 117254, 17 p. |
| Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |