A comparison of campfire impacts and policies in seven protected areas

Environmental Management
6393_Reid.pdf
By:  and 

Links

Abstract

Using resource-monitoring data from seven protected areas, the effectiveness of three campfire policies-campfire ban, designated campfires, and unregulated campfires-were assessed based on the number of fire sites and the amount of tree damage. Results indicate that unregulated campfire policies permitted substantial numbers of fire sites and tree damage in campsites, although fire bans did not eliminate or even substantially decrease these problems. A designated campfire policy was effective in decreasing number of fire sites, but little difference was found among policies regarding tree damage. Given the importance of campfires to visitor experiences, campfire prohibitions could be viewed as unnecessarily restrictive based on their limited success in preventing resource damage. Conclusions encourage protected-area managers to consider designated campfire policies and prohibitions on axes, hatchets, and saws to better meet resource protection and visitor experience mandates.

Additional publication details

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title A comparison of campfire impacts and policies in seven protected areas
Series title Environmental Management
Volume 36
Issue 1
Year Published 2005
Language English
Contributing office(s) Patuxent Wildlife Research Center
Description 48-58
Larger Work Type Article
Larger Work Subtype Journal Article
Larger Work Title Environmental Management
First page 48
Last page 58
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional metadata about this publication, not found in other parts of the page is in this table