How well can wave runup be predicted? comment on Laudier et al. (2011) and Stockdon et al. (2006)

Coastal Engineering
By:  and 



Laudier et al. (2011) suggested that there may be a systematic bias error in runup predictions using a model developed by Stockdon et al. (2006). Laudier et al. tested cases that sampled beach and wave conditions that differed from those used to develop the Stockdon et al. model. Based on our re-analysis, we found that in two of the three Laudier et al. cases observed overtopping was actually consistent with the Stockdon et al. predictions. In these cases, the revised predictions indicated substantial overtopping with, in one case, a freeboard deficit of 1 m. In the third case, the revised prediction had a low likelihood of overtopping, which reflected a large uncertainty due to wave conditions that included a broad and bi-modal frequency distribution. The discrepancy between Laudier et al. results and our re-analysis appear to be due, in part, to simplifications made by Laudier et al. when they implemented a reduced version of the Stockdon et al. model.

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title How well can wave runup be predicted? comment on Laudier et al. (2011) and Stockdon et al. (2006)
Series title Coastal Engineering
DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.05.001
Volume 102
Issue 2015
Year Published 2015
Language English
Publisher Elsevier
Publisher location Amsterdam
Contributing office(s) St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center
Description 5 p.
First page 44
Last page 48
Online Only (Y/N) N
Additional Online Files (Y/N) N
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional publication details