Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: A case study for the Southeast

Ecosystem Services
By: , and 

Links

Abstract

Ecosystem accounts, as formalized by the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Experimental Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA EEA), have been compiled in a number of countries, yet there have been few attempts to develop them for the U.S. We explore the potential for U.S. ecosystem accounting by compiling ecosystem extent, condition, and ecosystem services supply and use accounts for a ten-state region in the Southeast. The pilot accounts address air quality, water quality, biodiversity, carbon storage, recreation, and pollination for selected years from 2001 to 2015. Results illustrate how information from ecosystem accounts can contribute to policy and decision-making. Using an example from Atlanta, we also show how ecosystem accounts can be considered alongside other SEEA accounts to give a more complete picture of a local area’s environmental-economic trends. The process by which we determined where to place metrics within the accounting framework, which was strongly informed by the National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS), can provide guidance for future ecosystem accounts in the U.S. and other countries. Finally, we identify knowledge gaps that limit the inclusion of certain ecosystem services in the accounts and suggest future research that can close these gaps and improve future U.S. ecosystem accounts.

Study Area

Additional publication details

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: A case study for the Southeast
Series title Ecosystem Services
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101099
Volume 43
Year Published 2020
Language English
Publisher Elsevier
Contributing office(s) Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis
Description 101099, 18 p.
Country United States
State Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional metadata about this publication, not found in other parts of the page is in this table