The development of sample processing techniques that recover a broad suite of pesticides from solid matrices, while mitigating coextracted matrix interferences, and reducing processing time is beneficial for high throughput analyses. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an automated extraction system for pesticide analyses in solid environmental samples. An Energized Dispersive Guided Extraction (EDGE) system was used to evaluate two different extraction solvents in optimizing the extraction of 210 pesticides and pesticide transformation products. A graphitized carbon cleanup step was implemented, and three elution solvents were evaluated separately for analyte recoveries. Recoveries between 70 and 130% were achieved for 167 compounds in a test soil using acetonitrile as an extraction solvent and carbon cleanup with acetonitrile and dichloromethane elutions. Nine field samples (soil, sediment, and biosolids) were extracted using the newly developed method and were compared with a previously validated pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) method using an Accelerated Solvent Extraction (ASE) system. Concentrations obtained from the two methods were comparable (linear R² > 0.999), suggesting similar performance between the EDGE and PLE extractions in complex matrices. The new method provided slightly better sensitivities in comparison to the PLE method, ranging from 0.09 to 2.56 ng g⁻¹. The method presented here significantly reduces extraction setup and runtimes while also minimizing the volume of carcinogenic solvents (e.g., dichloromethane) used in the laboratory and presents a sensitive multiresidue method for a wide range of pesticides in solid matrices.