thumbnail

The limits of earthquake early warning accuracy and best alerting strategy

Science Advances
By: , , , , , , , and 
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39384-y

Links

Abstract

We explore how accurate earthquake early warning (EEW) can be, given our limited ability to forecast expected shaking even if the earthquake source is known. Because of the strong variability of ground motion metrics, such as peak ground acceleration (PGA) and peak ground velocity (PGV), we find that correct alerts (i.e., alerts that accurately predict the observed ground motion above a predetermined damage threshold) are not expected to be the most common EEW outcome even when the earthquake magnitude and location are accurately determined. Infrequently, ground motion variability results in a user receiving a false alert because the ground motion turned out to be significantly smaller than the damage threshold. More commonly, users will experience missed alerts when the system does not issue an alert but the user experiences potentially damaging shaking. Despite these inherit limitations, EEW can significantly mitigate earthquake losses for false-alert-arm-tolerant users who choose to receive alerts for expected ground motions much smaller than the level that could cause damage. Although this results in many false alerts for earthquakes that do not produce damaging ground shaking, it minimizes the number of missed alerts and produces overall optimal performance.

Study Area

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title The limits of earthquake early warning accuracy and best alerting strategy
Series title Science Advances
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-39384-y
Volume 9
Year Published 2019
Language English
Publisher Nature
Contributing office(s) Earthquake Science Center
Description 2478, 13 p.
Country United States
State California
City San Francisco, Los Angeles, Sacramento, Bakersfeld
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional publication details